A system for decision making, leadership and practical execution. Built for people operating in complexity.
All insights

Delay becomes fault

A slow decision can feel, to the person making it, like control. From every other seat in the room, it (should) look like presiding over a calamity.

By The Solutionist Agenda

Last week we learned to spot the disguise: avoidance dressed as diligence, and the question that strips it off. That was the diagnosis; this week is the reckoning. What it actually costs you when you let avoidance remain the path of least resistance.

Let me start with the comforting lie, because we have all told it to ourselves at one time or another. Delay feels prudent. Careful. Measured.

This assumes a hard call is a better call for being made slowly.

It isn't. Let's explore why.

Waiting does not hold a problem still. It grows one.

Diane Vaughan's work on the normalisation of deviance showed how small, unattended problems stop registering as problems at all; they get quietly absorbed into 'how things are done here', until one day they combine into a failure large enough to blow up the whole show.

Russell Ackoff spent a career on the companion point: in a complex system, an unmanaged issue does not sit still. It interacts. It breeds second and third order effects that become harder to diagnose and treat than the original ever was.

There is a cost inside your own head, too. The Zeigarnik effect (named for the psychologist Bluma Zeigarnik) describes how an unfinished task stays mentally switched on, running in the background, quietly draining attention you need elsewhere. An unmade decision is not neutral. It is a drain on the cognitive resources of every mind that knows about it.

And there is a cost to the room. Amy Edmondson's work on psychological safety found that people raise problems early when they watch their leaders engage with problems well. The reverse is equally true. When a team sees leadership respond maladaptively to the hard thing, they learn to stop bringing hard things. The problem is that the issues do not vanish, they submerge. And submerged is the most expensive place an issue can be.

Delay does not merely preserve a problem. It grows one. In your head. In the room. In the system.

The pressure you think you are holding

The data takes you only so far. The rest, you feel.

A slow decision feels, to the person making it, like control. Like holding the tension. Being measured. From the inside, delay soothes; it postpones the moment of exposure. It is also a lie.

From every other seat, it does the opposite. While you sit with it, the pressure does not dissipate, it accumulates. It seeps into the team. It settles as a low, background toxicity that is hard to name and harder to shift. And to the people around you it starts to look an awful lot like presiding over a calamity rather than solving one.

Then comes the threshold. Invisible, right up until you have crossed it. The point where the story quietly rewrites itself, and the problem stops being the thing that happened to you and becomes the thing you failed to deal with.

Delay becomes fault.

Hold on to that line. The market turned; that was not your doing. The system failed; that was not your design. But the six weeks you spent getting your arms around it while it spread, that part is yours. And it is the part they will remember.

So move. Let the action do the informing.

The instinct is to wait until you feel ready. It is exactly backwards.

One of the sturdiest findings in behavioural science is that action comes before motivation, not after it. We wait to feel ready before we move; in fact it is the moving that manufactures the readiness, and the information, and the momentum. Execution is not the reward at the end of thinking. It is one of the instruments of it.

So take the smallest real step now. Not a step that looks busy; a step that touches the actual problem and hands you back live information. Momentum is not a mood. It is a source of data you cannot get any other way.

And when it is time, which is almost always sooner than you would like, engage. Move toward the thing. That is where the job actually is.

The reframe

You will not be judged, in the end, on how thoughtfully you circled a problem. You will be judged on whether you turned and faced it. The trick to prevailing is finding a way to turn to the problem while it is still small enough to face.

None of this asks for more courage, capability or competence than you already have. It merely asks for less waiting. Gather fast. Commit early. Move while the problem is still small.

Do that, and delay never gets the chance to become fault.

Steve

The Solutionist Agenda. Clear thinking. Problems solved.

Subscribe

Get new thinking in your inbox